79 LR One Question 20
- « 79 LR One Question 19
- 3059 of 3815
- 79 LR One Question 21 »
Comments

I understand that if D is right, it would be like Goverment -> protection from D-> critical thinking.
Is this MBF because it makes the assumption that government guarantees critical thinking?
I thought since is cbt, it might be possible that mere presence of government come with the critical thinking. Since it has a stated necessary condition, does it mean it cannot have suff condition?

Here, the argument says that critical thinking is the only adequate protection. If that's true, then no other thing can be adequate protection. Only critical thinking is.

so when translate 'the only' into conditional form, "adequate protection -> critical thinking", I should have considered its semantical meaning of, "the only" too right?

Well, you don't have to; you could just work from your symbols (particularly the contrapositive).