72 Game 4
- « 72 Game 3
- 2627 of 3815
- 72 LR One Question 1 »
Comments

Looks like the videos are mixed up. This video is showing the explanation for G1. Any idea how to fix this to reflect G4?

My mom couldn't stop laughing at the first 6 seconds of this video lol


My method of attack was similar to yours, but I didn't refer to the answer choices as quickly as you (and I regret not having done so). I sketched out a rough "finished version" of the 1st grid, with all possibilities, and eliminated the repeats/rule-breakers. For example...for "J" (starting Monday), the sequence was J--> K-->L/M-->K/M/J.
I then looked for a pattern that would allow the "only 2 employees" scenario. At that point, I then looked at the answers, and had the "aha" moment, and just cross-checked each to see if it was possible.
I suppose that I could have done the same for the second grid, but this seemed to be enough.
Maybe this will help someone else, moving forward.

If J accepts a transfer, J only accepts transfers from M. Otherwise, J is on Monday. I understand this can be inferred, because if neither K or L can transfer to J per rules 2 and 3, then only M can transfer to J. Otherwise, J is on Monday, where accepting a transfer is not possible.
This doesn't, however, seem to prohibit K and L from accepting transfers from M. Put differently, the rules don't seem to prohibit M from transferring to K and L. Why can't K and L accept transfers from M? Why can't M transfer to K and L?
For instance, take #22. I've typed up a "diagram" below. It is clear that L cannot transfer to J, because this is stated in rule 3. This is why I've excluded J from W below:
M: J/K/M
T: L
W: K/M
R: L
As to why M is an excluded possibility for W, this remains unclear to me. As for the L on T, it seems that there is no issue accepting transfers from J and K, or having J and K transfer to L. The inclusion of M on Monday here is also in question.