61 Game 1
- « 60 RC Passage 4
- 1944 of 3815
- 61 Game 2 »
Comments
Hi Dave, just a general question regarding the rule set for this game.
Can we write out the rules like this:
H->G or F
not F and not G -> not H
J-> k or F
not K and not F -> not J
L->G
not G->not L
Would this apply?
Yes, you're almost there:
For the first two, I'd just want the visible reminder that they're not only present, but also driving. That ends up not being such a big deal in this game, but of course you'll never see this game on test day.
Crucially, though, your third rule is incomplete. You have to also add it the other way, so that the full complete rule looks like this:
L → G
~G → ~L
G → L
~L → ~G
That's why I prefer the grouping symbol for this and all other rules like it.
Keep up the good work!
d
I thought this game is like prep 62_2 so that I visualized like that because both don't distinguish column line like window 1,2,3/ car 1,2
Which part of mention in the passage, do you notice that these are different type?
In this game, the elements (people) can only belong to one of the groups.
In 62 game 2, the colors can belong to multiple groups.
Again, I think it is important (and very useful to you) for you to watch your Theory videos. This one covers this topic.
Delightful?? You changed man, this was a bitchy little game.
Sometimes if you tell yourself something is delightful long enough then it starts to seem true.
Right?
I'm trying, but no matter how many times I tell myself that the LSAT is delightful, it's not, it truly isn't.
Well, sounds like the only adequate response is for you to kick the LSAT right in the junk.
DO IT! DO IT! DO IT!
For Q2, E works for me if
car1: K (driver) + H + J and
car2: L (driver) + G + F.
Isn't it?
Not at all.
Every miss in a Games section boils down to misreading a question or missing a rule (from the rule set, or from the setup, or from the question). Sometimes you just need fresh eyes to see what you missed.