61 LR Two Question 24
- « 61 LR Two Question 23
- 1996 of 3815
- 61 LR Two Question 25 »
Comments

Permalink Submitted by Carlo Aguirre on Oct 23 2020
so I saw the suff v nec conflation again
premise was
same age-> comfortable
x->y
the assumption is the second part of the conclusion
that long (friend->comfortable)-> same age
y->x
so the flaw would be it assumed that or failed to see a break up in the correlation
aka
fails to see either
~y->x or y-> ~x
we got the former in AC E
not same age->comfort
~x->y
or put contra
not comfort-> same age
`=~y->x
is that reasoning a good strategy for picking flaw Acs from suff v nec conflation flawed arguments?