51 LR Two Question 20
- « 51 LR Two Question 19
- 1408 of 3815
- 51 LR Two Question 21 »
Comments

Permalink Submitted by omarabdelhamid on Jun 17 2020
But if Samantha was the murderer, she would have avoided leaving
behind footprints or fingerprints. The police found
fingerprints but no footprints at the scene of the
crime
this almost threw me off a little.

Permalink Submitted by majorgeneraldave on Jun 18 2020
Since it only almost threw you off, I can't tell if you're asking me something about it or just making a note of it.
In case of the former, I'll say this: the fingerprints must not have been Samantha's, if she did it. Because if they were Samantha's, then the fact that the police found them guarantees that Samantha didn't do it; if she had, she would not have left her fingerprints.