43 LR One Question 17
- « 43 LR One Question 16
- 849 of 3815
- 43 LR One Question 18 »
Comments
How did you deal with the other bit about increased spending on refugees? That threw me off in my structural analysis.
I ignored it. We can't prove anything on that basis. That's why we focus on the load-bearing language when we see it!
So the right answer is some combination of top and bottom All Sc?
The right answer could be any combination of facts from the first two sentences (in other words, here as always, the right answer is something we can prove).
Maybe it’s a grammar quesiton.
In the second sentence, does “five countries with a permanent seat on the SC” mean that the SC has only 5 countries for the permanent seat?
Yes; the definite article ("the") tells us that. Without it, we'd only know that there are at least five countries (it would say "five of the countries...").
If the NC has only 5 seats and all of them are in favor of ~, why not C?
I don't understand what you mean by "If the NC has only 5 seats and all of them are in favor of ~" but I can tell you that nothing in this passage proves that (C) is true. It might be true, but that wasn't what we were asked.
For the inference math, would you be able to prove that some countries that are not in the Southern Hemisphere want peace and are in favour of a greater role? Thanks
Yes; the five permanent members want peace, a greater role, and are not in the Southern hemisphere.