36 LR Two Question 24
- « 36 LR Two Question 23
- 469 of 3815
- 36 LR Two Question 25 »
Comments

Permalink Submitted by Trody32 on Nov 19 2015
I liked C but I didn't feel like the author indicated the opposite in the passage. He says strikes are evidence that the union's negotiating position was too weak and the newspaper article says the strength was declining. I feel like the author offered an alternative position or even an alternative weakness rather than the opposite of the newspaper article's position. So with that, B made sense. I just don't see how the author indicates strikes are a strength by saying the union's negotiating position is weak.

Permalink Submitted by majorgeneraldave on Nov 20 2015
The newspaper says the unions are weak, because they had very few strikes.
The author says that having lots of strikes would indicate weakness; having few means the unions are strong.
Clearer?