31 LR Two Question 20
- « 31 LR Two Question 19
- 170 of 3815
- 31 LR Two Question 21 »
Comments

Could you please help me to understand why {B} is wrong?

In order to contradict evidence, the claim would have to be such that both it and the evidence could not be true at the same time.
E.g.: I know Martin is at Disneyland. I saw him in Baltimore this morning.
Here, the claim (he's at Disneyland) directly contradicts the evidence (he's in Baltimore).
Got it?

Ok, now I can understand what B said. Thanks a million! Certainly B can't be the right answer.

Man i got stuck on that too, I knew form the moment it was an analogy but took me some time to find a word. I did look at answer D. offering an "alternative explanation" Could you explain why compared to A is incorrect?

In order for (D) to be correct, we'd have to have Sedley explaining some fact in a way that's different from how Beckstein explained that fact. Since that doesn't happen here, (D) is incorrect.