30 LR Two Question 19
- « 30 LR Two Question 18
- 112 of 3815
- 30 LR Two Question 20 »
Comments

I got the right answer but with a different approach than bait & switch. I treated this question like a false choice argument employing an unbalanced- balance sheet.
The passage accounted for the intake of each food type but not the output in acquiring the food (time & energy used). So I was was able to predict the answer would be about time/energy through a different scope and came out on the other end!
Is it problematic that I'm seeing different flaw types than what you're presenting, and I maybe just got lucky this time that I came out with the same answer anyways? Or, is this a more fluid process than that ? Thanks!!!

I love it! This is good work, and it points up two things:
1. Many arguments do in fact exhibit multiple flaws. You may sometimes identify a flaw that is present in the argument, but is not addressed by answer choices. That just means there's at least one additional flaw present.
2. Many flaws can be accurately (or at the very least, usefully) described in multiple ways.
I think this is a case of the latter phenomenon, and it shows me that you're learning and applying that knowledge in new situations.
Keep up the good work!
d