RSS
FeedlyCan anyone please explain what distinguishes answer choice (A) from (E). Obviously I understand that E is a perfect choice and I should have picked that. However, I do not see at all why I should have skipped past answer choice (A), specifically because a premise in the argument is that to offend is not to cause harm. Is some tricky business going on here or am I missing something?
Page 336 Question 12
Jul 29 2014
#1
kaveh180
Page 336 Question 12
Aug 2 2014
#2
majorgeneraldave
Whoa: (E) is NOT the right answer. We cannot make any inference about "serious" harm, for one thing, since the passage gave us no method of grading harm levels (for another, the passage explicitly says that such restrictions may perhaps be OK). So maybe (E) is true, but we can't prove it based on what we've got here.
(A) on the other hand (as you've pointed out) derives direct proof from the passage.
Make sense?
Aug 2 2014
#3
kaveh180
yea, i understand. thank you for clearing it up. sorry about this. I think i needed to take a couple days off from LSAT because I was starting to make some silly errors