RSS
Feedlyi think i am missing something. i am on the part of RC where we talk about rating the difficulty on 3 points
then i just watched a bit of page 98 video, talking about 4 stars?
what am i missing friends?
4 stars? i thought it was a 3 point system
Nov 15 2011
#1
ubclaw
4 stars? i thought it was a 3 point system
Nov 15 2011
#2
majorgeneraldave
I've evolved the system. In order to have a way of more-strongly penalizing passages with only two paragraphs, I've added a star (or point, whichever you prefer):
1 star for 3 paragraphs (hurting those 2-paragraph passages)
1 for 4 paragraphs (rewarding 4-paragraph passages)
1 for any item from READ ACTIVELY within the first paragraph
1 for readability (compared to other RC passages you've seen. Not to Grisham novels)
Sorry for the confusion. Do you remember where I talked about a 3-point system? I'd like to edit that appropriately.
Nov 15 2011
#3
ubclaw
page 89 assessing difficulity in rc videos chapter 4.
where can i find this new four star information?
is it in the future somewhere?
Nov 15 2011
#4
majorgeneraldave
The idea is exactly the same as expressed in the Page 89 video.
I've simply separated out 3- and 4-paragraph passages so that each gets its own star (see my itemization above, and the discussion at the open of Page 98).